Category Archives: Uncategorized

Auro Shared Hosting New Year 2011 Offer

Auro Infotech is happy to announce our New Year Special offer on Shared Hosting where you can get our 1GB package with free domain and MS SQL Server for just Rs.999/- a year.

Our standard 1GB package is now only Rs.999/- per year (19.95USD per year) as a part of the New Year offer until 15-Jan-2011. (Service tax of 10.30% applicable).

This package also comes with Microsoft SQL Server databases included in it – besides the usual MySQL database. The features in this package are:

  • Free domain registration or transfer
  • 1GB Disk Space
  • 10GB Bandwidth usage per month
  • Unlimited MS SQL and MySQL databases
  • Unlimited Email Accounts
  • Unlimited FTP accounts
  • Unlimited sub domains and parked domains
  • Control Panel (Plesk on Windows server and CPanel on Linux server)
  • SMTP/POP3 with Webmail
  • Weekly Backups included
  • 24 by 7 support

This offer is applicable to new registrations as well as domain transfers. The offer is valid for the life of your account, which means that you just pay Rs.999/- each year during renewal and nothing more.

Also, this offer also qualifies for our Annual Auro Shared Hosting Customer Loyalty Rewards Programme.

Get your domain name and hosting account today by signing up today at New Year Promotion Order Online:


  1. 10.30% service tax will apply on all orders.
  2. MS SQL Server is available only on Windows servers.
  3. This special offer expires on 15-Jan-2011.
  4. During order placement, the domain cost will say Rs.450/-, accept it and the promotional discount will be applied right away. The final checkout will be only Rs.999/- as the total amount to be paid for this offer.

Please click here to contact us if you have any questions on this offer

IE 7 and IE 8 Mess with Websites

I do not have words to describe the pain we went through with handling IE7 and IE8 on a recent release of a new website for one of our very important clients.

As always, we followed a very rigorous QA testing process and our QA team had signed off on the cross browser testing of the application, The QA team had tested the website on PC, MAC and mobile browsers. They had tested on Firefox (versions 2, 3 and 3.6), Internet Explorer (7 and 8), Opera, Safari and Chrome. This testing was done on different resolutions.

After taking care of all these variations, we confirmed to the clients that the website was fully ready to go live. The client also tested from a machine at home and said that everything was fine.

Then started the nightmare.

The client went to the office and tested again to realize that their entire left menu did not work. The best part is, it worked right on a few machines and did not work on a few. I tested on a IE7 machine and it was messed up, It worked fine on another IE8 machine.

As we continued our investigation, we found out that with IE7 and IE8, Microsoft has introduced a new feature called ‘Compabitibility View’. As per Microsoft’s explanations on Compatibility view, Compatibility view exists to accomodate those features that were used in older sites.

In addition, we noticed that Javascript was disabled by default in IE7 and IE8. It is very difficult to believe that Microsoft just decided to strengthen the security and make such huge change on Javascript related features. Many of the online users would not even know where to go to enable it.

This problem was solved by enabling compatibility view or by enabling javascript. We are still trying to find out the exact set of steps that happen when we enable compatibility view, so that we can try and see if we can programmatically enable it if required.

The best case scenario will be where we develop the sites, test it across standard browsers and it works without any exceptions. We do remember the nightmare we went through with IE6 testing and we felt better after taking the decision to discontinue support for IE6 and provide only on demand support for IE6 for the websites we develop.

Will provide an update after we investigate this further.

Employee of the year 2009 – Aravind Raj

We are happy to announce that Aravind has been selected as the Employee of the Year 2009 at Auro Infotech.

Aravind has been with Auro Infotech for five years now and has grown from the role of a Server Administrator to Manager of the Server Support Team.

In this role, he has gone above and beyond his basic job responsibilities and has contributed to various initiatives at Auro Infotech.

In 2009, Aravind was instrumental in leading the efforts in engineering various solutions such as WordPress MU, Magento, OpenX, etc. He has also been managing various client initiatives in different projects we delivered to our clients.

As a result, in 2010, Aravind is now also overseeing the design team and is on track to managing the operations of Auro Infotech, Chennai.

As a part of this reward, Aravind gets a special gift of his choice from the Auro Infotech Management team. I hope he will write about his gift in the near future.

Please join me in congratulating Aravind on a job well done and wish him all the best in all his future initiatives.

Weekly Status Reports at Auro Infotech

Every week, the Team Leaders at Auro Infotech are expected to report a Weekly Status Report (WSR) on each project their teams work on. This report is sent at the end of the week to the clients. This report has to be produced on every project where there was any work done during the week.

A sample WSR is given below:

——-Auro Infotech Weekly Status Report Begins—————–
Sample Status report: Weekly Status Report on Music Plugin for Week Ending 27-January-2006

Project Name: Music Plugin Enhancements v3.0
Project Started on: 26-January-2006
Project Planned End Date: 13-February-2006

Status Report for Week Ending: 27-January-2006
Current Phase: Coding

Previous Accomplishments:

Accomplishments during the week: (23-January-2006 to 27-January-2006)

1. Coding: Changes to Home page

Plans for next Week:( 30-January-2006 ) to (03-February-2006 )

1. Coding: Create Static Page on the fly

Future Tasks:

1. Week of 6th Feb: Coding and Testing
2. Week of 13th Feb: Release
Project Status (Development Team view): On target

——-Auro Infotech Weekly Status Report Ends—————–

5. Weekly Status Reports should be sent to the clients at the end of every week by the team leaders

6. The following are the statuses:
1. Completed – Client Signed Off
2. Pending Client Sign Off – This is if the client has checked it and said everything looks ok, but has not sent an official sign off.
3. Pending UAT – If the client is still testing something.
4. Pending QA Sign Off – If coding is completed and is with the QA team.
5. Coding – If coding is going on.
6. On Hold – If client has put this on hold.
7. No Response – Sent more than one mail to the client with no response from client.

Difference between Effort and Duration

Many times our clients ask us “How much time do you need to complete this task”.

Typically the development teams respond by saying “It will take 12 hours to complete it” or “It will be completed in 12 hours”.
The above two sentences have two completely different meanings.
“It will take 12 hours to complete it” refers to an effort of 12 hours required to complete the work.
“It will be completed in 12 hours” refers to the duration within which the task will be completed.

Having said that, lets understand the difference between the terms “Effort” and “Duration”.

Effort refers to the number of person days or person hours required to complete a task. Eg. 12 hours of effort: This means if one person worked on this task non stop, they can complete the task in 12 hours.

Duration refers to the time period required to complete the task. Eg. 12 hours duration: This means the task will be completed in 12 hours time. ie. This statement does not say how many people will be working on it. It could be 3 people working for 8 hours of effort each and getting it ready within 12 hours duration. It could also be that one person will be working on it for 3 hours of effort, but will have time to complete it only in 12 hours time.

In order to get out of this confusion, we have set certain guidelines to be used by our teams whenever interacting with clients on topics of effort and duration.

While giving a proposal/estimate, we always give two numbers:
Estimated Effort
Estimated Duration

Also when replying to any client queries on when a task will be ready, we give them two data points: one about effort and the other about duration.

We will be interested in knowing if any other teams use a variation of this for their terminologies.